WebExport 1.1 General Discussion

Write here for feature requests, etc. regarding WebExport 1.1.

6 Responses to “WebExport 1.1 General Discussion”

  1. jakub Says:

    hello, I have found little problem with templates - they use command like

    which causes problem in case of duplicate filenames - for example photos from different film rolls may have same filename like img023.jpg. In this case image files are overwritten. So it should be used something like

    to get really unique filenames and avoid overwritting images (this syntax works but generates error message.

  2. jakub Says:

    hello, I have found little problem with templates - they use command like
    ?image(900,600,'images/')?
    which causes problem in case of duplicate filenames - for example photos from different film rolls may have same filename like img023.jpg. In this case image files are overwritten. So it should be used something like
    ?image(900,600,'images/'+str(p_index))?
    to get really unique filenames and avoid overwritting images (this syntax works but generates error message.

  3. Daniel Staudigel Says:

    Yes. This is a problem. I am not sure how to fix what you are describing, because using the original filename is a benefit in my eyes. I may change it so you can select what to name the file and that the same name is assumed, or something like that. However, you say there are errors/warnings about what you did on the second line. Please describe/paste these errors, because as far as I can tell, that looks like a valid statement.

  4. David Says:

    webexport.pkg file doesn't want to open. 1.1r8

  5. Greg Says:

    It's the best iPhoto plugin I have. Good work. What I really needed was EXIF tag export. I am building a suitable template (will notify you when its done), but needed to modify export.py to import EXIF (the sourceforge python EXIF handler). I suggest including

    try: import EXIF
    except: pass

    to export.py, so that people who have EXIF installed can use it, and those who don't will not be bothered.

  6. Daniel Staudigel Says:

    That is awesome. I will definitely add that to the next round. Great finding a solution that works within the current framework!

    Thanks!

Leave a Reply